Two, maybe more, groups

[Todd Coplien]

What if they were scheduled for the same day and the regional groups
collaborated? Or maybe even figure out what regionals would look like then
have regional leaders. With quarterly meetings and then one huge state-wide
meeting.

On Aug 25, 2016 10:45 AM, "Simon Quigley" <tsimonq2 at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> >  Maybe something larger than a city, but smaller than a state would
> > work. North and South would seem to be the easiest. The could get people
> > involved in the group on a more regular basis. Maybe once a year people
> > get together.
> >
> > There are a lot of iterations, but there's also the Northwest,
> > Northeast, Southwest, Southeast option. This basically ends up like
> > separate MSN and MKE groups in the south, but maybe that is what is
> needed.
>
> I don't think this is a good idea. Fragmentation might hurt the group
> overall.
>
> --
> Simon Quigley
> tsimonq2 at ubuntu.com
> tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC
>
> --
> For more information about this team, navigate to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/
> WisconsinTeam
> Ubuntu-us-wi mailing list
> Ubuntu-us-wi at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
> mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-wi
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-us-wi/attachments/20160825/cbb3bb1f/attachment.html>