What if they were scheduled for the same day and the regional groups collaborated? Or maybe even figure out what regionals would look like then have regional leaders. With quarterly meetings and then one huge state-wide meeting. <div class="gmail_extra"> <div class="gmail_quote">On Aug 25, 2016 10:45 AM, "Simon Quigley" <<a href="mailto:tsimonq2@ubuntu.com">tsimonq2@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi, > Maybe something larger than a city, but smaller than a state would > work. North and South would seem to be the easiest. The could get people > involved in the group on a more regular basis. Maybe once a year people > get together. > > There are a lot of iterations, but there's also the Northwest, > Northeast, Southwest, Southeast option. This basically ends up like > separate MSN and MKE groups in the south, but maybe that is what is needed. I don't think this is a good idea. Fragmentation might hurt the group overall. -- Simon Quigley <a href="mailto:tsimonq2@ubuntu.com">tsimonq2@ubuntu.com</a> tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC -- For more information about this team, navigate to <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WisconsinTeam Ubuntu-us-wi" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WisconsinTeam Ubuntu-us-wi</a> mailing list <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-us-wi@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-us-wi@lists.ubuntu.com</a> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-wi" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-wi</a> </blockquote></div></div>