Bugging questions

[Jordan Mantha]

On 4/27/06, Scott Dier <dieman at ringworld.org> wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > I considered "escalated", but I don't remember what issue I had with it.
> > Seems fine to me now.
>
> All I would worry about is that 'escalated' feels to me that its been
> given a higher priority -- whereas the priority here is undefined and
> the bug itself has a delegated responsibility to upstream.

I agree.

One thought that came to my mind is that perhaps leaving a more
detailed explanation along with the status change would help clarify
the meaning of the status. I just don't see how a couple words can
accurately define the status to all readers. The biggest issue is
getting people to understand what the status fields mean. Many people
have people seem to have problems with statuses. Maybe on the Malone
main page some descriptions could be added, just to help out. Just a
thought.

-Jordan Mantha