Bugging questions

[Matthew East]

On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 11:49 -0500, Scott Dier wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > I considered "escalated", but I don't remember what issue I had with it.
> > Seems fine to me now.
> 
> All I would worry about is that 'escalated' feels to me that its been 
> given a higher priority -- whereas the priority here is undefined and 
> the bug itself has a delegated responsibility to upstream.

Chipping in two more cents: I agree with Scott: "forwarded" sounds ideal
to me.

Matt
-- 
mdke at ubuntu.com
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20060427/b6bdfa73/attachment.pgp