Confusing intertwining of Ubuntu Development teams for Membership
mark at ubuntu.com
Mon Mar 8 16:16:08 GMT 2010
On 08/03/10 15:35, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Mark Shuttleworth <mark at ubuntu.com
> <mailto:mark at ubuntu.com>> wrote:
> On 08/03/10 13:55, Matthew East wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Benj. Mako Hill <mako at atdot.cc>
> >> <quote who="Emmet Hikory" date="Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:17:39AM
> >>> The alternative to this move would be to add all current
> >>> of Ubuntu Contributing Developers (~universe-contributors) to
> >>> Members (~ubuntumembers) and grant the Developer Membership Board
> >>> direct administration over Ubuntu Members (~ubuntumembers), in
> >>> case Ubuntu Contributing Developers may be removed.
> >> That makes sense to me. I don't understand the benefit of
> keeping the
> >> two distinct.
> > +1
> -1. I think we should retain a delegated membership group that is
> developer-centric, rather than lump it all in ubuntumembers.
> What about retaining these delegated membership groups but having each
> of these groups have direct membership in ubuntumembers? This would
> make the relationship of these teams with ubuntumembers explicit which
> provides the benefit of making it easier for the CC to keep track of
> the teams which do grant membership as well as identify teams which
> weren't intended to give membership but do incidentally.
That's fine by me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the technical-board