Confusing intertwining of Ubuntu Development teams for Membership

[Mark Shuttleworth]

On 08/03/10 15:35, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Mark Shuttleworth <mark at ubuntu.com
> <mailto:mark at ubuntu.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 08/03/10 13:55, Matthew East wrote:
>     > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Benj. Mako Hill <mako at atdot.cc>
>     wrote:
>     >
>     >> <quote who="Emmet Hikory" date="Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:17:39AM
>     +0900">
>     >>
>     >>>     The alternative to this move would be to add all current
>     members
>     >>> of Ubuntu Contributing Developers (~universe-contributors) to
>     Ubuntu
>     >>> Members (~ubuntumembers) and grant the Developer Membership Board
>     >>> direct administration over Ubuntu Members (~ubuntumembers), in
>     which
>     >>> case Ubuntu Contributing Developers may be removed.
>     >>>
>     >> That makes sense to me. I don't understand the benefit of
>     keeping the
>     >> two distinct.
>     >>
>     > +1
>     >
>
>     -1. I think we should retain a delegated membership group that is
>     developer-centric, rather than lump it all in ubuntumembers.
>
>
> What about retaining these delegated membership groups but having each
> of these groups have direct membership in ubuntumembers?  This would
> make the relationship of these teams with ubuntumembers explicit which
> provides the benefit of making it easier for the CC to keep track of
> the teams which do grant membership as well as identify teams which
> weren't intended to give membership but do incidentally.

That's fine by me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/attachments/20100308/103e4278/attachment.htm