qbranch : notes and questions about behavior under explorer and relative to branch

[Maritza Mendez]

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Alexander Belchenko <bialix at ukr.net> wrote:

> Maritza Mendez пишет:
> > So it seems that in addition to the difference between qbranch under
> > explorer and qbranch from the commandline, it may also be true that
> > qbranch adds a fair bit of overhead compared to branch.  What could that
> > be?  Is the Qt event loop really that greedy?
>
> Are you sure that Explorer runs qbranch dialog? There is several
> custom dialogs inside Explorer, so maybe it was actually custom one?
> In this case I can imagine Explorer trying to open your new branch and
> it took additional 1.5 minutes.
>
> I'm planning to investigate Explorer's performance in the near time,
> and I have some ideas to check. But at first I need to review all
> outstanding merge proposals and triage bugs. So it won't be fast :-/
>
>
>
Alexander,

You are correct.  I have Explorer is set to use the custom dialogs,
specifically including the branch custom dialog.  Thanks for the question.

I don't expect a quick response.  I know there's a lot to get done.  I just
add this to the discussion.  Incidentally, my expereince using bzr and
Explorer with large projects is consistent between my own large projects and
other large projects like lp:emacs and lp:mysql-server.  I don;t think I'm
seeiing anythign atypical, but improvements in "typical" are always
appreciated.

~M
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20100805/4fe849fd/attachment.htm