<br><br> <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Alexander Belchenko <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bialix@ukr.net">bialix@ukr.net</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">Maritza Mendez пишет:<br> <div class="im">> So it seems that in addition to the difference between qbranch under<br>> explorer and qbranch from the commandline, it may also be true that<br>> qbranch adds a fair bit of overhead compared to branch. What could that<br> > be? Is the Qt event loop really that greedy?<br><br></div>Are you sure that Explorer runs qbranch dialog? There is several<br>custom dialogs inside Explorer, so maybe it was actually custom one?<br>In this case I can imagine Explorer trying to open your new branch and<br> it took additional 1.5 minutes.<br><br>I'm planning to investigate Explorer's performance in the near time,<br>and I have some ideas to check. But at first I need to review all<br>outstanding merge proposals and triage bugs. So it won't be fast :-/<br> <br><br></blockquote></div> <div><br>Alexander,</div> <div> </div> <div>You are correct. I have Explorer is set to use the custom dialogs, specifically including the branch custom dialog. Thanks for the question. </div> <div> </div> <div>I don't expect a quick response. I know there's a lot to get done. I just add this to the discussion. Incidentally, my expereince using bzr and Explorer with large projects is consistent between my own large projects and other large projects like lp:emacs and lp:mysql-server. I don;t think I'm seeiing anythign atypical, but improvements in "typical" are always appreciated. </div> <div> </div> <div>~M</div> <div> </div>