qbranch : notes and questions about behavior under explorer and relative to branch

[Alexander Belchenko]

Maritza Mendez пишет:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Alexander Belchenko <bialix at ukr.net
> <mailto:bialix at ukr.net>> wrote:
> 
>     Maritza Mendez пишет:
>     > So it seems that in addition to the difference between qbranch under
>     > explorer and qbranch from the commandline, it may also be true that
>     > qbranch adds a fair bit of overhead compared to branch.  What
>     could that
>     > be?  Is the Qt event loop really that greedy?
> 
>     Are you sure that Explorer runs qbranch dialog? There is several
>     custom dialogs inside Explorer, so maybe it was actually custom one?
>     In this case I can imagine Explorer trying to open your new branch and
>     it took additional 1.5 minutes.
> 
>     I'm planning to investigate Explorer's performance in the near time,
>     and I have some ideas to check. But at first I need to review all
>     outstanding merge proposals and triage bugs. So it won't be fast :-/
> 
> 
> 
> Alexander,
>  
> You are correct.  I have Explorer is set to use the custom dialogs,
> specifically including the branch custom dialog.  Thanks for the question. 
>  
> I don't expect a quick response.  I know there's a lot to get done.  I
> just add this to the discussion.  Incidentally, my expereince using bzr
> and Explorer with large projects is consistent between my own large
> projects and other large projects like lp:emacs and lp:mysql-server.  I
> don;t think I'm seeiing anythign atypical, but improvements in "typical"
> are always appreciated. 
>  
> ~M
>  

I'm only a mere mortal, alas.