bzr status and commit strange behaviour

[Alexander Belchenko]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stefano Spinucci пишет:
> On 3/17/07, Alexander Belchenko <bialix at ukr.net> wrote:
>> Stefano Spinucci пишет:
>> > On 3/17/07, Alexander Belchenko <bialix at ukr.net> wrote:
>> >> Stefano Spinucci пишет:
>> >> > On Windows 2000, using the unofficial binary provided by Alexander
>> >> > Belchenko
>> >> (https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/2007q1/023474.html),
>> >> > working on a network share, I encountered the following problem:
>> >>
>> >> What you mean by "working on a network share"?
>> >> Does you working on local disk checkout from remote machine,
>> >> or completely on remote machine that connected to some drive letter?
>> >
>> > I was working on a remote machine connected to a drive letter
>>
>> Probably this is the root of problem. I never try to work in such
>> environment.
> 
> As you said replying to my first message to this list
> (https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/2007q1/023251.html):
> "There is absolutely NO problems to store repo on any disk.
> Bazaar supports usual hard drives, USB flash disks, UNC shared
> network locations, and even file network protocols as SFTP/FTP."
> 
> Then, following your reply, thinking that a remote machine connected
> to a drive letter was an "UNC shared network locations", I started
> using bazaar in my work environment.

Well, I'm always try to talk about things that I know and I'm sure.

I was talking about storing the repository on shared network location
and checkout of this repository on local disk. I never try before
to work with bzr completely on shared network location all the time,
because it could be somewhat slow in some network environment.

I'm recently fixing bug related to working with UNC \\HOST\path locations
and assume you're asking about such things.

Sorry for a kind of misinformation.

Although in the past I successfully work in such environment
with TortoiseCVS and CVSNT. And I'm convinced that Bazaar is not worse than CVSNT.

> Maybe I misinterpreted your reply and I should not use bazaar with the
> repo stored on a shared network location ???

Until we understand what is problem in your case I cannot say "yes or no".
Because you're working over network connection, and there is *always* exists
some nitpick details.

And the more we testing Bazaar in various environment, the more robust Bazaar will be.
Is this approach is appropriate for you?

[µ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF/IaVzYr338mxwCURAmobAKCPNbwf5MZ4ARiyiL4sP0BkBDilFgCgiWRg
MZ8P5+2i4K9e63aL4m1o1lc=
=sG3k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----