TEAM: Wily Werewolf Package Testing
elfy at gmx.co.uk
Mon May 25 18:13:05 UTC 2015
On 25/05/15 18:51, elfy wrote:
> On 25/05/15 18:28, saqman2060 wrote:
>> What I am trying to say, make the testing a little more interesting.
>> Something new every cycle. Also, we can remove the test for a feature
>> and create another test for a feature that was not covered. In this
>> attempt, we don't over extend the testcase itself.
>> Istimsak Abdulbasir.
> What I am trying to say is that unless someone has a _real_ reason to
> run with package testing - then we will not be doing it.
> I'm certainly not going to get into creating more tests for people not
> to do in the hope that magically we get more testers - and by more I
> really don't mean 4 instead of 2.
> These tests, creating new testsuites and all the other things that
> need to be done in order for them to be usable take time - they don't
> just happen.
> I'm all for ideas, but this thread is about
> I plan to not do so this cycle unless anyone thinks that we should
> - and just thinking we should isn't likely to change my mind
> I've seen nothing to change my mind.
That said - with the next cycle being LTS it's always possible we change
back for that. Which gives us a cycle to think about and deal with that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the xubuntu-devel