TEAM: Wily Werewolf Package Testing

elfy elfy at gmx.co.uk
Mon May 25 18:13:05 UTC 2015


On 25/05/15 18:51, elfy wrote:
> On 25/05/15 18:28, saqman2060 wrote:
>> [snip]
>> What I am trying to say, make the testing a little more interesting. 
>> Something new every cycle. Also, we can remove the test for a feature 
>> and create another test for a feature that was not covered. In this 
>> attempt, we don't over extend the testcase itself.
>>
>> Istimsak Abdulbasir.
>>
>>
> What I am trying to say is that unless someone has a _real_ reason to 
> run with package testing - then we will not be doing it.
>
> I'm certainly not going to get into creating more tests for people not 
> to do in the hope that magically we get more testers - and by more I 
> really don't mean 4 instead of 2.
>
> These tests, creating new testsuites and all the other things that 
> need to be done in order for them to be usable take time - they don't 
> just happen.
>
> I'm all for ideas, but this thread is about
>
>     I plan to not do so this cycle unless anyone thinks that we should
>     - and just thinking we should isn't likely to change my mind
>
> I've seen nothing to change my mind.
>
>
That said - with the next cycle being LTS it's always possible we change 
back for that. Which gives us a cycle to think about and deal with that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20150525/88930203/attachment.html>


More information about the xubuntu-devel mailing list