<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25/05/15 18:51, elfy wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5563612B.3000005@gmx.co.uk" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25/05/15 18:28, saqman2060 wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:1432574914.3860.0@smtp.gmail.com"
type="cite"> [snip]
<div>What I am trying to say, make the testing a little more
interesting. Something new every cycle. Also, we can remove
the test for a feature and create another test for a feature
that was not covered. In this attempt, we don't over extend
the testcase itself.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Istimsak Abdulbasir. </div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
What I am trying to say is that unless someone has a <u>real</u>
reason to run with package testing - then we will not be doing it.<br>
<br>
I'm certainly not going to get into creating more tests for people
not to do in the hope that magically we get more testers - and by
more I really don't mean 4 instead of 2. <br>
<br>
These tests, creating new testsuites and all the other things that
need to be done in order for them to be usable take time - they
don't just happen. <br>
<br>
I'm all for ideas, but this thread is about <br>
<br>
<blockquote>I plan to not do so this cycle unless anyone thinks
that we should - and just thinking we should isn't likely to
change my mind <span class="moz-smiley-s3" title=";)"></span> <br>
</blockquote>
I've seen nothing to change my mind. <br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
That said - with the next cycle being LTS it's always possible we
change back for that. Which gives us a cycle to think about and deal
with that.<br>
</body>
</html>