update_4

[jmak]

On 7/13/06, daniele favara <danjele at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/12/06, jmak <jozmak at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7/12/06, Jani Monoses <jani.monoses at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
>
> > The logo, I am proposing, cannot be considered change, I merely
> > stylized of the old one to be more in style with the general
> > improvements in other software.
>
> if i' not wrong ... a logo should be printable and clear on black &
> white ... i guess the logo as it is now is ok.
>
> your improvement could be used for wallpapers and general artwork ..
> but in my opinion the official one shouldn't use shadows or other
> effects.
>

Daniel,

Maybe, you are a bit behind the times. Logo can be 3d, glossy, and can
have shadows. Check out the official Apple logo.

Here is a link.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Computer


J. Mak
-- 
http://jozmak.googlepages.com/