[ubuntu-x] Xserver 1.9 / 1.10 decision

[Bryce Harrington]

On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 08:10:28PM -0500, Eric Appleman wrote:
> On 11/30/2010 03:16 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 09:19:36PM +1100, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote:
> >> Hey Ubuntu-Xers.
> >>
> >> At UDS we decided to defer deciding between Xserver 1.9 and 1.10 for
> >> Natty until the close of the 1.10 merge window, to gauge how dangerous
> >> 1.10 is likely to be.
> >>
> >> The merge window closes tomorrow, and there doesn't seem to be anything
> >> particularly flammable.  There's lots of cleanup, the new input stuff
> >> that we'll be getting anyway, and some extra GLX infrastructure which
> >> drivers may want to hook into.
> >>
> >> This all looks fairly benign, so I suggest we go with 1.10 for Natty.
> >>
> >> What do other Xers think?
> > I like the sound of 'benign'.
> >
> > We'd discussed a plan of putting snapshots of it into xorg-edgers, to
> > get the packaging work squared away and get some light testing under our
> > belt, and then plan on rolling it into release post-holidays.  Does that
> > still seem to be a sensible strategy?
> >
> > Bryce
> >
> >
> Fence sync just landed at the last minute. Is 1.10 now a no-go for Natty?

Well, it's less benign looking now I guess.

OTOH I did a quick look-thru of the patches and they didn't look too
scary (patches are reasonably short) although they do change things in
Damage.  But looks like something we could revert pretty simply if it
did cause problems.

Bryce