Any other alternative to at

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 17:58 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> there are different `ls`

Now I need to be nitpicking, since there are at best common aliases for
"ls", non of which I ever would use, but those common aliases still are
using "ls". Again, depending on what you try to achieve "tree" could be
a good alternative for "ls". AFAIK there are _not_ different "ls" unless
you compare the FreeBSD "ls" of an default install with the default
Ubuntu install "ls", they indeed at least differ in the way you could
order options and paths.