Any other alternative to at

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:07 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 17:58 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

Oops, Peng Yu wrote :D:
> > there are different `ls`
> 
> Now I need to be nitpicking, since there are at best common aliases for
> "ls", non of which I ever would use, but those common aliases still are
> using "ls". Again, depending on what you try to achieve "tree" could be
> a good alternative for "ls". AFAIK there are _not_ different "ls" unless
> you compare the FreeBSD "ls" of an default install with the default
> Ubuntu install "ls", they indeed at least differ in the way you could
> order options and paths.