Any other alternative to at

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 10:50:38 -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
>> Could you tell us WHY you don't want to use "at"? Scheduling jobs is
>> exactly and precisely what it is designed to do!  
>
>For many many other tasks, there are usually multiple alternatives
>that can achieve almost the same things with some variants. For
>example, there are different programming languages, or there are
>different `ls`.
>
>It looks weird to me that there would be no alternative to `at`.

Oops, I pushed the wrong button first. My apologies for the emty reply.

Yes, we are aware that there are alternatives. One alternative for e.g.
"ls" is "tree", but "tree" doesn't replace "ls", so the reason why
still requiers some explanation of what you want to achieve.

You still did not describe what you want to do.

>$ man systemd.timer
>No manual entry for systemd.timer

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=systemd.timer