list at xenhideout.nl
Mon Dec 4 07:25:27 UTC 2017
Joel Rees schreef op 04-12-2017 0:56:
> Did you miss the part where some guy who was doing it for a living in
> 2009 gave a description if what he did and said explicitly how
> sucessful he was and gave some background on why the usual case,
> recovering data from a heavily used HD, was more successful than from a
> once-used, practcally empty HD?
I must say that sounds rather convincing. I mean it was in the comments
to other article (thank you).
>> You also don't allude which companies offer these (explicit) services.
> I guess you didn't look at the URL as you read the second one?
The problem is that on that same site is this article:
Which is from a scientist 'proving' that it can't be done.
The extra data only seems to be required to 'anchor' the process because
of known-file recognition and perhaps subsequent tuning of parameters
based on that.
Which means that a disk not containing any operating system files would
be unrecoverable, according to this guy.
I don't discount this tale so it seems you are right.
At least, back in 2009.
> I half to admit, I'm not sure why I bother mentioning it. If we worry
> too much about where our information leaks, we can't use any of this
> marvelous technology. Each of us has to choose how, and to what level,
> we protect ourselves.
Yes. The process took upward a month according to that guy and at a cost
of > $1000 for a 120GB drive.
More information about the ubuntu-users