jessejazza3 at aol.co.uk
Tue Aug 9 21:57:58 UTC 2011
From: Billie Walsh <bilwalsh at swbell.net>
To: ubuntu-users <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
Sent: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 21:06
Subject: Re: Test msg!
On 08/09/2011 10:17 AM, Tero Pesonen wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 14:54 -0500, Larry Shields wrote:
>> Yahoo mail has to much spam, which I hate more than anything...
> No large-scale free provider handles spam well. They don't need to.
> Their business is selling ads, not offering a good email service.
> Tero Pesonen
I use Yahoo and find it has some excellent spam filters. You just have
to spend a little time "teaching" them what you consider spam and what
I have to agree with you on Yahoo spam. I think they have the best of
any provider (once Spamguard is "trained")... in fact the only thing i
now find in my spam box IS THEIR JUNK mail [LOL]. Yahoo introduced a
new interface claiming it's twice as fast when in fact it's
considerably slower than their 'Classic' mail and slower than any other
provider. As one can't use imap with Yahoo - today that is a big
negative in my view.
When it comes to receiving spam i find the main perpetrators are these
Forums. Strange how as soon as one joins several forums one is flooded
with spam - i assume they sell the email addresses. I now have one
email address for signing up to these things - strange why i don't
receive spam in my other accounts!!!!!!
Regarding the comments about free email - i have to say that i've found
gmail and aol excellent. Gmail spam guard is excellent... but strange
how one receives so much! AOL spam guard not so good but adequate.
More information about the ubuntu-users