installing XP

[Johnneylee Rollins]

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 6:59 PM, NoOp <glgxg at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On 02/12/2010 06:45 PM, Johnneylee Rollins wrote:
>>> Huh?  Why on earth would you even suggest that?
>> Because it looks like windows but is linux, no need for a VM.
>> I'm glad you have an opinion, don't use it to disparage mine.
>
> You suggested:
> <quote>
> There is a windows look alike distro from china. It's on distrowatch.
> Might look into that.
> </quote>
>
> What am I to take that as? You provided no links, but appear to
> encourage the OP to search fo a "windows look alike distro from china".
> So just *what* were you suggesting?
> Care to provide links to your 'suggestion'?
>
> Note:
> Disparage my ass.  I asked a question - care to answer it?
> <quote>
>  Why on earth would you even suggest that?
> </quote>
>
>>
>>> WinXP/Win2K/Win7 runs just fine in virtualbox (PUEL). Thomas obviously
>>> has other issues: "And I reinstall my ubuntu after installing the XP.
>>> Now they run both very well."
>>
>> Depends, does he have a system with the necessary resources to run a
>> system with so much silly overhead on top of his linux system?
>
> Don't know until he tries it. Seems to work just fine for me
> w/2.4Ghz/1G. Obviously he may encounter issues with his particular
> system, but he really won't know until he gives it a go. Will he?
>
Oh just bugger off. I know you don't like me, you've never passed up
on trying to get under my skin.

~SpaceGhost

>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>