glgxg at sbcglobal.net
Sat Feb 13 03:18:44 UTC 2010
On 02/12/2010 07:02 PM, Johnneylee Rollins wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 6:59 PM, NoOp <glgxg at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> On 02/12/2010 06:45 PM, Johnneylee Rollins wrote:
>>>> Huh? Why on earth would you even suggest that?
>>> Because it looks like windows but is linux, no need for a VM.
>>> I'm glad you have an opinion, don't use it to disparage mine.
>> You suggested:
>> There is a windows look alike distro from china. It's on distrowatch.
>> Might look into that.
>> What am I to take that as? You provided no links, but appear to
>> encourage the OP to search fo a "windows look alike distro from china".
>> So just *what* were you suggesting?
>> Care to provide links to your 'suggestion'?
>> Disparage my ass. I asked a question - care to answer it?
>> Why on earth would you even suggest that?
>>>> WinXP/Win2K/Win7 runs just fine in virtualbox (PUEL). Thomas obviously
>>>> has other issues: "And I reinstall my ubuntu after installing the XP.
>>>> Now they run both very well."
>>> Depends, does he have a system with the necessary resources to run a
>>> system with so much silly overhead on top of his linux system?
>> Don't know until he tries it. Seems to work just fine for me
>> w/2.4Ghz/1G. Obviously he may encounter issues with his particular
>> system, but he really won't know until he gives it a go. Will he?
> Oh just bugger off. I know you don't like me, you've never passed up
> on trying to get under my skin.
Sounds like a Karl reponse to me... btw did you ever figure out the
difference between "carle/Carle" and Karl?
BTW: I've nothing "against you" I'd just like you to answer the question.
More information about the ubuntu-users