Ubuntu 10.04 BETA1 (Lucid)
Fred A. Miller
fmiller at lightlink.com
Tue Apr 6 07:08:29 UTC 2010
On 04/06/2010 02:51 AM, Grizzly wrote:
> On 05 April 2010 at 21:29, Fred A. Miller
> Enlightened me with this:-Re: Ubuntu 10.04 BETA1 (Lucid)
>> On 04/05/2010 02:55 PM, Grizzly wrote:
>>> On 5 Apr 2010 at 23:34, Basil Chupin wrote: Ubuntu 10.04 BETA1 (Lucid) (at
>>> least in part)
>>>> This is not meant to provoke a desktop or a distro war, so read it in
>>>> this light.
>>> Can I "upgrade" to 10.4(beta) from 9.10 direct or do I need to start a fresh?
>> You can upgrade.....I did one 2 days ago
> I tried last night, expected time to install was 2:49 @ 23:00 it dropped to
> 2:30 by 23:48 (getting mew packages) so I went to bed and left it running :-<
> This morning @ 07:30 it was up to 3:26 (installing packages) so I gave up
> should it take that long to upgrade, I havnt got the fastest ADSL line but it
> does run @ 1.4mb
'Wouldn't think so. I haven't run Ubuntu for that long, but at no time
have I noted any of the servers being that slow.
Q: What's the difference between Obama and his dog, Bo?
A: Bo has papers.
More information about the ubuntu-users