Ubuntu 10.04 BETA1 (Lucid)

Basil Chupin blchupin at iinet.net.au
Tue Apr 6 08:09:19 UTC 2010


On 06/04/10 17:08, Fred A. Miller wrote:
> On 04/06/2010 02:51 AM, Grizzly wrote:
>    
>> On 05 April 2010 at 21:29, Fred A. Miller
>> Enlightened me with this:-Re: Ubuntu 10.04 BETA1 (Lucid)
>>
>>
>>      
>>> On 04/05/2010 02:55 PM, Grizzly wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> On 5 Apr 2010 at 23:34, Basil Chupin wrote: Ubuntu 10.04 BETA1 (Lucid) (at
>>>> least in part)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> This is not meant to provoke a desktop or a distro war, so read it in
>>>>> this light.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>> Can I "upgrade" to 10.4(beta) from 9.10 direct or do I need to start a fresh?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> You can upgrade.....I did one 2 days ago
>>>
>>>        
>> I tried last night, expected time to install was 2:49 @ 23:00 it dropped to
>> 2:30 by 23:48 (getting mew packages) so I went to bed and left it running :-<
>>
>> This morning @ 07:30 it was up to 3:26 (installing packages) so I gave up
>>
>> should it take that long to upgrade, I havnt got the fastest ADSL line but it
>> does run @ 1.4mb
>>
>>      
> 'Wouldn't think so. I haven't run Ubuntu for that long, but at no time
> have I noted any of the servers being that slow.
>
> Fred
>    

As far as I am concerned, they *ARE* slow :-( . I get thruout of around 
17Kbs/s or less. If I get up to 50+Kbs/s I am laughing.

BC


BC

-- 

In a period of great joy and pleasure you are comforted by the thought that tragedy is just around the corner.






More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list