pine

[Steven Susbauer]

On Jul 25, 2009, at 10:13 PM, NoOp wrote:
>
> In any event, I think that you can safely turn off your GnuPG sig for
> this list; afterall do you expect others on the list to send you an
> encrypted response?
>
> As I mentioned previously; the signature is as irritating as those  
> that
> send the 'confidentiality' notices from a company account. In fact  
> it is
> *more* irritating because it also includes:

Pine correctly supports the PGP/MIME, does it not? Maybe I am  
confusing it with mutt...

Either way, if you insist on signing the message, PGP/MIME attachments  
are at least less obtrusive. I know for a fact that Enigmail supports  
using it instead of inline.

  -Steve