pine

[NoOp]

On 07/25/2009 07:08 PM, Karl F. Larsen wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Res wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Steve Flynn wrote:
>> 
>>> i.e. "-- " (dash dash space - take heed to include of the space -
>>> very, very important).
>> 
>> Karls setup would be correct for how its done, some pgp, insert (yes 
>> wrongfully) a separate dash before any sig delims, screwing it all up, its 
>> one of the reasons i stopped using it myself a while back, it was annoying 
>> to me so I know it most have peeved others.
>> 
> 
> 	Steve I will write the guy I send email to in the National HQ of Bank
> of America. If he has a problem he has never told me. We started this
> when Obama was elected. But I will ask him because I am an owner and he
> might not tell me.
> 
> 
> 73 Karl
> 
> 
> 
> 
> - --
> 
> 	Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
> 	Linux User
> 	#450462   http://counter.li.org.
>         Key ID = 3951B48D
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFKa7qyNuSIOjlRtI0RAhj8AJ0StzHscOhyEFPpGCjmD2wkoKlkQwCfYtCu
> JAtUibyQYyTrbUgerqjvx7w=
> =Ki4p
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

I've left it all in so that you can see it.

That's the BofA HQ in Nigeria right :-)

Anyway, this thread looks to be already 3 years old:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/2006-April/073331.html
Note the references to Pine and, of course gpg signatures.

And of course don't miss the 'Next message: OT: USENET and cryptography
(was: "annoying" inline gpg signatures)' posts.

In any event, I think that you can safely turn off your GnuPG sig for
this list; afterall do you expect others on the list to send you an
encrypted response?

As I mentioned previously; the signature is as irritating as those that
send the 'confidentiality' notices from a company account. In fact it is
*more* irritating because it also includes:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>

at the start of the post.