No good CD-Rom copy software (fwd)

[NoOp]

Top posted on purpose.

Two questions:

1. Why is it that you can't seem to figure out how to post in the
original thread and instead continue to spawn these new posts?

2. 'Joerg'/Jörg Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
posted on this list previously

Message-ID: <4a48993a.5OvWfFQn9ND8gJni%Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Subject: Re: No good CD-Rom copy software
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:36:42 +0200

so apparently he's subscribed to the list. Any reason why you need to do
a 'man-in-the-middle' here?

Recommend that you go back to the original thread and comment there.


On 07/06/2009 03:49 PM, Res wrote:
> 
> Thanks Jorg, this only confirms mine and others suspicions..
> 
> Oli, and others: forwarded to the list so you dont have to wait a week for 
> the mod to approve the post.
> 
> So, Oli, what has Ubuntu got to say about this....., also please CC Jorg
> directly in Emails reference this issue (as he is not a member of this list).
> 
> Res
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:25:46
> From: Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com, res at ausics.net
> Subject: Re: No good CD-Rom copy software
> 
> Res <res at ausics.net> wrote:
> 
>> Well, then lets hear Jorgs point of view on this...
>> I will gladly report his reply to the list if he says thats OK, given he
>> is not a member so you wont have to wait a week for the mod to see and
>> approve his post to the list.
>>
>> Jorg for your reference, the stated reason was linked to in an earler
>> reply I've already deleted, but this is the archive that they pointed to:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-news-team/2009-February/000413.html
> 
> Just a note, this does not contain not an official statement from Eben
> Moglen, there is only a POV claim from Mark Shuttleworth and this is
> definitely wrong :-(
> 
> Eben Moglen did tell me in several private mails that there is no license problem
> with cdrtools. Moglen send me even mail that explains why the claims about the
> so-called GPL CDDL incompatibility as found on the FSF websites are wrong.
> 
> I am sure that Moglen will never make a public claim that could support the
> statement from Mark Shuttleworth.
> 
> Note that The Sun legal department did make a full legal review on the cdrtools
> project and did not find any license problem.
> 
> Note that the book from an independend lawyer (Lawrence Rosen - the lawyer of
> the OpenSource Inittiative) wrote a book on OSS licenses that explains the GPL
> in a word level granularity (see: http://www.rosenlaw.com/Rosen_Ch06.pdf) and
> that explains why none of the claims made by the  non-cooperative Debian
> package maintainer that initated the dispute is valid.
> 
> Jörg
> 
>