Open Office Bug
Karl F. Larsen
klarsen1 at gmail.com
Wed Dec 16 01:30:11 UTC 2009
NoOp wrote:
> On 12/15/2009 03:15 PM, NoOp wrote:
> ...
>> and the result was garbage text in the formalas. I then opened the doc
>> in standard OOo 3.1:
>> $ cat /opt/openoffice.org3/program/versionrc
>> [Version]
>> AllLanguages=en-US
>> buildid=310m19(Build:9420)
>> ExtensionUpdateURL=http://updateext.services.openoffice.org/ProductUpdateService/check.Update
>> OOOBaseVersion=3.1
>> ProductBuildid=9420
>> ProductMajor=310
>> ProductMinor=19
>> ProductSource=OOO310
>> UpdateID=OpenOffice.org_3_en-US
>> UpdateURL=http://update32.services.openoffice.org/ProductUpdateService/check.Update?pkgfmt=deb
>> UpdateUserAgent=<PRODUCT> (${buildid}; ${_OS}; ${_ARCH};
>> BundledLanguages=${AllLanguages})
>>
>> and the export is correct. You can rule out cups-pdf as well, print to
>> cups-pdf and to ps works w/o issue. I'll comment on that bug later
>> today, but I think that this is the isse that you are seeing.
>
> Correction, I just now experienced the same on standard OOo. Tested
> again (s)OOo and no issues. So it seems to be a font race issue? Anyway,
> I've saved the pdf's & will attach the tests to that bug report + check
> the upstream (s)OOo bug reports as well. There is an upstream novell
> (that is the version Ubuntu uses):
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440055
> but given that I reproduced in (s)OOo I'll check/report there as well.
>
> You guy's might want to test with test2.odt to see if you get
> same/similar results. Please ensure that you show your versionrc's if
> yoiu comment on the bug(s) so that the dev's know which version to
> tested with.
>
>
I just tested the OO 3.1.1 on Ubuntu 9.10 and see no change
in the test and test.pdf I made with the OO and viewed with my
usual pdf reader.
Karl
--
Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
Linux User
#450462 http://counter.li.org.
Key ID = 3951B48D
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list