Open Office Bug

NoOp glgxg at sbcglobal.net
Tue Dec 15 23:26:46 UTC 2009


On 12/15/2009 03:15 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
> and the result was garbage text in the formalas. I then opened the doc
> in standard OOo 3.1:
> $ cat /opt/openoffice.org3/program/versionrc
> [Version]
> AllLanguages=en-US
> buildid=310m19(Build:9420)
> ExtensionUpdateURL=http://updateext.services.openoffice.org/ProductUpdateService/check.Update
> OOOBaseVersion=3.1
> ProductBuildid=9420
> ProductMajor=310
> ProductMinor=19
> ProductSource=OOO310
> UpdateID=OpenOffice.org_3_en-US
> UpdateURL=http://update32.services.openoffice.org/ProductUpdateService/check.Update?pkgfmt=deb
> UpdateUserAgent=<PRODUCT> (${buildid}; ${_OS}; ${_ARCH};
> BundledLanguages=${AllLanguages})
> 
> and the export is correct. You can rule out cups-pdf as well, print to
> cups-pdf and to ps works w/o issue. I'll comment on that bug later
> today, but I think that this is the isse that you are seeing.

Correction, I just now experienced the same on standard OOo. Tested
again (s)OOo and no issues. So it seems to be a font race issue? Anyway,
I've saved the pdf's & will attach the tests to that bug report + check
the upstream (s)OOo bug reports as well. There is an upstream novell
(that is the version Ubuntu uses):
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440055
but given that I reproduced in (s)OOo I'll check/report there as well.

You guy's might want to test with test2.odt to see if you get
same/similar results. Please ensure that you show your versionrc's if
yoiu comment on the bug(s) so that the dev's know which version to
tested with.





More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list