LDAP, ActiveDirectory and the death of Linux at corporate
Donald D Henson
wepin at wepin.com
Wed Aug 15 17:25:35 UTC 2007
Brian Fahrlander wrote:
> I just 'enjoyed' telling my contractor-boss that "If you're not
> going to rely on the Linux server for email (using Exchange instead for
> the reminders,etc) and you're not using it to serve files (cause they
> don't need it) and the on-site tech is windows-based, why is that
> machine there?".
> Microsoft came in through the front door, but it squeezes out
> competition by the darkened side-streets, and climbing in metaphorical
> windows. (Pardon the pun)
> The contractor has been telling me he wants to support Linux, but
> in this little low-tech town, while the Windows business keeps climbing,
> we've added only three other Linux clients. His first offering, though
> he refuses to admit it) is always a Windows jail.
> If we can't get up some kind of people-organizer, more of these
> sites will fall to Exchange. If we can't get our collective asses
> organized, ActiveDirectory will eat our LDAP ambitions.
> I've tried getting in touch with the two main LDAP-centric
> community pages; there must be some mechanism to find them than I've
> tried. The LDAP sub-community is bottle-necked, adhering to one vendor's
> layout or another....when all we need to begin is our _own_ layout that
> will authenticate for us.
> Why is nothing happening on this part? Can anyone clue me? I know
> LDAP seems "hard"...but it's not that bad. Deciding how to layout the
> data (with all it's flexibility) is the hard part. We can fix this; we
> don't have to stand-down and let Microsoft roll right over us...
> If you're interested in LDAP in any way, please contact me.
I'm interested and have been thinking of trying my hand at implementing
LDAP on my small home network (two workstations and a
server/workstation. However, I'm a complete newbie when it comes to
LDAP. I'd love to observe and would be willing to do some "newbie
testing" of the type, "Would a newbie understand these instructions or
is there too much jargon in there"? I've also done a fair amount of
unofficial tech editing in my time. Let me know if I can be of any help.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the ubuntu-users