dapper and evolution and thunderbird
Russell Cook
bike_oz at yahoo.com.au
Tue May 16 12:53:26 UTC 2006
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:32 +0100, Jon Dixon wrote:
> Russell Cook wrote:
> > Just out of interest does anyone else find the following.
> >
> > Evolution is much snappier than Thunderbird. When I change messages in
> > the window list, Evolution takes noticeably less time than thunderbird
> > to display the new message. For me, responsiveness of the user
> > interface/experience is important and on my reasonably fast AMD have a
> > noticeable difference to display the next message is off putting about
> > thunderbird. It's one of the things Evo does right IMHO.
> >
>
> Yes; goes for me too.
>
> Evolution is a pretty good drop in replacement for those users with MS
> Outlook experience.
>
> I've seen user comments about the speed difference between Ubuntu
> Firefox and the Mozilla release. Is it the same with Thunderbird?
I find Firefox quite zippy. I use it and epiphany and am happy with it
overall. It just appears to be thunderbird screen updates/changes are
interminably slow.
Kind Regards Russell
==================
www.windsorcycles.com.au
sales at windsorcycles.com.au
ph. 02 4577 3209
bikes.no-ip.info
Linux user #369094
==================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20060516/525fa307/attachment.html>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list