OT: USENET and cryptography (was: "annoying" inline gpg signatures)
Anthony David
adavid at adavid.com.au
Sun Apr 9 12:21:41 UTC 2006
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 10:28:10AM +0000, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Kenneth P. Turvey wrote:
> > What
> > we really need is an update of the USENET protocols. There are a number
> > of problems with NNTP that could be addressed using cryptography.
>
> I think that if existing newreaders would finally support MIME, the
> world could be a lot better.
AFAIR, GNUS support MIME. Why would you use MIME in a newspost anyway?
I reckon it opens up a greater can of worms just to support S/MIME.
>
> Unfortunately, the development of newsreaders has stalled in the past.
> I love slrn, but the development stalled.
>
> > We could have a relatively spam free USENET with working cancels and
> > supersedes, and a common set of procedures for creating and removing
> > groups, authenticating users and so on.
>
> Yes, if they would be used consistently, usenet would be the ideal place
> to discuss. Unfortunately, it is not used consistently, and a common
> cause for off-topic chatter like this subthread.
>
> > Unfortunately, getting this all to work and be adopted would be nearly
> > impossible due to the resistance of current USENET users.
>
> I don't think that users are resistant. I think it is more a problem
> that the current newsreaders and MUA aren't integrated well, and their
> interface to the user is horrible, which makes USENET very unattractive
> to lots of users.
>
> Greetings,
> Reinhard
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
--
Anthony David
Gambling(n): A discretionary tax on those asleep during high school maths
http://adavid.com.au/
0xA72CE1ED fingerprint = EA1E C69E FE59 BBE1 AA4B F354 BD09 9765 A72C E1ED
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list