OS X/Ubuntu/GnuLinux and cost
David
david at kenpro.com.au
Sun Oct 9 22:58:19 UTC 2005
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 02:16:16PM -0700, Daniel Robitaille wrote:
>
> The other sticky point for me for OS X is the price tag. To get the
> latest and greatest version of it (and Safari, and Mail.app, etc), you
> need to shell out 100+ $ every 18 months or so. If you don't, then you
> have something that become slowly more and more obsolete, until it is
> not security supported in ~3 years.
>
> While Ubuntu's deadlines for upgrade come more quickly (except for
> Dapper next April), at least Ubuntu is not aiming at my wallet every so
> often :)
<soapbox>
What's the problem with shelling out $100 for an OS? Are you suggesting
that there is no value in the work that goes into them? (even windows!).
Do you also want your meals delivered for free? Do you want your hardware
sent from the factory for nothing?
Getting Ubuntu or any other Gnu/Linux for nothing is a bonus, but not the
point. OSX allows you to run lots of FOSS software and my understanding is
that the kernel is open source, which is far more important.
</soapbox>
Returning to the topic... I run both Hoary and OSX, and OSX is still in
front for usability, but Ubuntu is slowly catching up. It's the common
non-free software that is going to be the stumbling block in the medium
term in my opinion. For someone looking for flexibility, I think Hoary is
now actually better because of Linux's easier access to the nuts and bolts
of the system, especially the window management.
David.
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list