Backports

Magnus Therning magnus at therning.org
Thu Jun 9 06:28:25 UTC 2005


On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 09:44:15AM +1000, Gary Jarrel wrote:
>I've recently enabled backports to install & evaluate NVU (recent
>thread) in doing so, the system appears to have a numebr of new updates
>that can be installed which were not otherwise available.
>
>My understading is that backports are entirely un-supported. So if I
>install for example gcc-4.0-base from the backports repository which
>would in effect remove gcc-3.5-base due to the conflict (keeping in
>mind that gcc-3.5-base is supported), does that mean that any further
>update made to main or restricted repositories for the gcc-x.x-base
>package will not appear in the "upgrade" list (say if I wanted to
>revert back to the supported package).

You have understood it correctly. This is one of the reasons why I keep
the backports repo commented out in my sources.list, I only uncomment it
to install individual packages.

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning                    (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus at therning.org
http://therning.org/magnus

Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish.
Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship
by patent law on written works.

Found in comp.lang.scheme:
> What's so great about the lambda calculus?           
In a profession plagued by, "when all you have is a hammer, everything
looks like a nail," we get really excited when someone is able to come
along and prove that everything really *is* a nail if lambda is the
hammer.
     -- brlewis at my-deja.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20050609/3a9763ce/attachment.pgp>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list