MS game Risk II - question from newbie

Oliver Grawert hostmaster at grawert.net
Tue Dec 28 12:11:59 UTC 2004


hi,
Am Dienstag, den 28.12.2004, 09:01 +0000 schrieb Sean Miller:
> Just taken a look at the archive; it's intriguing because just about 
> *everybody* seems to want "reply to list", yet one or two people say 
> "the general consensus was to stick with how it is"...
> Broken threads, solutions which are not shared with the community -- how on 
> earth can that be good?!?!? I do not understand that logic at all...
> 
> Also, people seem to think that a "Reply to list" button is the norm.... 
> on what? I do not use Evolution, but none of my mail clients have such a 
> thing...
may i kindly point you to this standarization document from 1977 (!)
which specifys the transport of list email ? 
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc733.html

it is a problem of your mail application, not of the listmaster as you
can see there. without such standards there would be no internet, no
linux and no exchange of information between systems at all. so please
poke the author of your mail app to implement that feature if he didnt
regard this standard to make it function as sane as other mailapps.

ciao
	oli

-- 
got ubuntu ? --------------> GET UBUNTU !!!
http://www.ubuntulinux.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20041228/20af7d6b/attachment.sig>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list