Ubuntu-Chicago Off topic KDE vvs Gnome

[Freddy Martinez]

and the apps are better IMO. amarok, Koffice, Konversation (i use xchat
anyways) etc.

On 9/16/06, Freddy Martinez <freddymartinez9 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I found GNOME hard to navigate and ugly. As for speed, I'm not sure about
> that, but I just need to use KDE for everything. Its very easy to navigate
> and that's what I need.
>
> On 9/16/06, Mike Greenwood <mjgreenwood at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > That's what's kind of wierd, I want stuff from both.  I like the feel of
> > gnome as well but there's allot from the KDE side that I want.
> > I'm so conflicted.... (the hardships of life :)
> >
> > mike
> >
> >
> > On 9/16/06, Max Luebbe <max.luebbe at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > GNOME has shared libs as well (gtk,glib)
> > > Regardless of speed, I've just never been a fan of KDE.
> > > I really can't explain my reasoning - GNOME just feels better.
> > >
> > > -Max
> > >
> > > On 9/16/06, RJ Marsan < rjmarsan at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > KDE has all of the K* apps use the same libs as kde, so it uses less
> > > ram
> > > > than usual, therefore slightly faster.  As for speed, it all depends
> > > on how
> > > > configured it is.  By default it runs fine, but if you strip out
> > > some stupid
> > > > features it runs faster than GNOME.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 9/16/06, Andrew Bassett <andrew at abassett.org > wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 10:38 -0500, Mike Greenwood wrote:
> > > > > > Well I know this is a bit off topic and has been beaten into the
> > > > > > ground but I wanted Chicago's take on this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm a gnome fan only buy default (I'm use to it).  I've install
> > > kde in
> > > > > > the past and was impressed.  This time how ever I got into it a
> > > bit
> > > > > > and tweaked the display.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I noticed that KDE seems to run crazy fast compared to
> > > gnome.  Is this
> > > > > > something others have experienced?  Since apps are
> > > interchangeable
> > > > > > what are your pro/cons
> > > > > > for each?  Just thought I'd ask...
> > > > >
> > > > > I've heard a claim before that each new version of KDE supposedly
> > > runs
> > > > > faster on the same hardware. I can't really comment further on
> > > this -
> > > > > I'm a big GNOME user and have tried KDE over the years, but always
> > > end
> > > > > up coming back to GNOME. Hopefully a KDE user has some insight
> > > because I
> > > > > have tended to notice that GNOME can be a bit sluggish at times.
> > > > >
> > > > > > PS.  I got a new job..!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  I'm tossing that old one
> > > to the
> > > > > > curb
> > > > >
> > > > > Congratulations!
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Andrew Bassett
> > > > > andrew at abassett.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Ubuntu-us-chicago mailing list
> > > > > Ubuntu-us-chicago at lists.ubuntu.com
> > > > >
> > > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-chicago
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Ubuntu-us-chicago mailing list
> > > > Ubuntu-us-chicago at lists.ubuntu.com
> > > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-chicago
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ubuntu-us-chicago mailing list
> > > Ubuntu-us-chicago at lists.ubuntu.com
> > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-chicago
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ubuntu-us-chicago mailing list
> > Ubuntu-us-chicago at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-chicago
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> -Freddy Martinez-
> Kubuntu. [GNU/]Linux for human beings.
> </message>
>



-- 
-Freddy Martinez-
Kubuntu. [GNU/]Linux for human beings.
</message>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-us-chicago/attachments/20060916/620e7d94/attachment.htm