building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment
ayobinitie at googlemail.com
Tue Jan 6 09:41:16 GMT 2009
I have to say I've had the opposite experience. I'm actually tempted to
upgrade all my machines to Intrepid but for the fact that I love both
interfaces and would like to keep both. I'd be interested to know what you
have found buggy with Intrepid
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Glenn Holmer <gholmer at ameritech.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 19:57 -0800, Rafael Chacon wrote:
> > Canonical releases a new version of Ubuntu every six months. As each
> > new version, it is normal that the new version has fewer bugs than the
> > previous one (e.g. Windows 2008 has fewer bugs than Windows Vista).
> Strongly disagree. I upgraded from 8.04 "Heron" to 8.10 "Ibex", and
> found it so buggy that I actually downgraded several machines to 8.04
> (including my main box). LTS (long-term support) releases like 8.04
> will by definition always be more stable than the "let's release every
> six months whether it's ready or not" versions.
> This is why I don't think it's that big a deal that the real-time kernel
> is not available for Studio 8.10; I've stayed on 8.04 and been happy.
> "After the vintage season came the aftermath - and Cenbe."
> Glenn Holmer (Q-Link: ShadowM) http://www.lyonlabs.org
> Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-users