I have to say I've had the opposite experience. I'm actually tempted to upgrade all my machines to Intrepid but for the fact that I love both interfaces and would like to keep both. I'd be interested to know what you have found buggy with Intrepid<br> <br>a<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Glenn Holmer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gholmer@ameritech.net">gholmer@ameritech.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="Ih2E3d">On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 19:57 -0800, Rafael Chacon wrote:<br> > Canonical releases a new version of Ubuntu every six months. As each<br> > new version, it is normal that the new version has fewer bugs than the<br> > previous one (e.g. Windows 2008 has fewer bugs than Windows Vista).<br> <br> </div>Strongly disagree.  I upgraded from 8.04 "Heron" to 8.10 "Ibex", and<br> found it so buggy that I actually downgraded several machines to 8.04<br> (including my main box).  LTS (long-term support) releases like 8.04<br> will by definition always be more stable than the "let's release every<br> six months whether it's ready or not" versions.<br> <br> This is why I don't think it's that big a deal that the real-time kernel<br> is not available for Studio 8.10; I've stayed on 8.04 and been happy.<br> <font color="#888888"><br> --<br> "After the vintage season came the aftermath - and Cenbe."<br> Glenn Holmer  (Q-Link: ShadowM)  <a href="http://www.lyonlabs.org" target="_blank">http://www.lyonlabs.org</a><br> </font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br> <br> <br> --<br> Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users</a><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br>