Please review and advocate 389-directory-server (a successor of LDAP) related packages in REVU so that 389 can make it into Karmic

Victor Hugo dos Santos listas.vhs at
Wed Jul 22 13:39:43 UTC 2009

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Mathias Gug<mathiaz at> wrote:
> Hi Victor,
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Victor Hugo dos
> Santos<listas.vhs at> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Kai-Cheung
>> Leung<kcleung at> wrote:
>> outside this commentary, I agree que FDS is a better solution for
>> manager LDAP/OpenLDAP structure.
> Could you be more specific about the advantages of 389 directory over openldap?
> One of the best ldap server (openldap) is already available in the
> archive and I was wondering what are the advantages of having another
> full-blown ldap server to maintain in addition to openldap?

mmm.. I believe that the principal characteristic or advantage of 389,
is the multi-master replication...
this is a big advantage in high-available infrastructures.

Further, most administrators have one or various front-end for
administer the LDAP tree. In this case, the GUI is part official of


Victor Hugo dos Santos
Linux Counter #224399

More information about the ubuntu-server mailing list