QA wiki update

[Gema Gomez]

On 11/01/2012 17:49, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
> Alex, I started working through your version of the wiki also today. I
> pulled some of the changes you had made and replaced/edited the relevant
> sections on the main page. It would be good to get your content merged
> asap, so it doesn't fall out of date. We have the ability to revert
> changes, so I would encourage you to make your changes directly onto the
> main site and we can tweak as we get more feedback. Thoughts?

+1

It is quite confusing to have to send people to a temporary copy, having
the new content on the main wiki would help loads keep improving. Plus,
we have a very comprehensive new version already.


> 
> Nicholas
>> Hi Alex,
>> thanks a lot for this change! My feedback follows.
>>
>> *Structure of the page*
>>
>> I think the wiki should have a clearer structure, so we should think
>> about how to reorganize the text in a way that tells our story and
>> sounds appealing to the reader. So I propose:
>>
>> == Welcome ==
>> <introduction goes here, let's say what you have already before "What
>> kinds of things does Ubuntu QA do?">
>>
>> == What we do ==
>> <you have the list on the wiki, in my  opinion it needs a bit of
>> reworking>
>>
>> == Getting involved ==
>> <here we explain how to get involved in the work we are doing so things
>> like a link to the qa-ubuntu list, qa launchpad group are good there,
>> plus a link to our weekly meeting>
>>
>> == Currect Activities ==
>> <Sounds good>
>>
>> == Contact Us ==
>> <Sounds good too>
>>
>>
>> *Content of the page*
>>
>> - I think this statement needs rewriting:
>> "The Ubuntu QA team is focused on developing tools, policies, and
>> practices for ensuring Ubuntu's quality as a distribution as well as
>> providing general advice, oversight, and leadership of QA activities
>> within the Ubuntu project."
>>
>> AFAIK, we do not develop tools, we mainly use them. But we write and
>> develop test cases :D
>>
>> - The areas in which QA is divided do not make much sense either, at
>> least from my perspective, maybe it was like that in the past? Need some
>> time to think about this one.
>>
>> - What is the difference between the "Testing Team" and the "QA Team"?
>> We seem to have two different pages and I am not sure they are trying to
>> convey different messages. The paragraph starting with "We cannot leave
>> quality to good luck" is repeated in both.
>>
>> I love the design and the icons at the top, very stylish :D
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gema
>>
>> On 13/12/11 21:00, Alex Lourie wrote:
>> >/  Hi all
>> />/
>> />/  I've started working on our wiki [1] page update [2]. So far I've
>> />/  cleared the obvious
>> />/  parts (about Bug Squad for example), updated the content and
>> changed the
>> />/  order of things
>> />/  to better cater to the potential reader.
>> />/
>> />/  Please review and provide feedback :-)
>> />/
>> />/  Thanks a lot.
>> />/
>> />/  [1]https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam
>> />/  [2]https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlexLourie/QAWikiNew
>> />/
>> />/  -- />/  Alex Lourie
>> />/
>> />/
>> /
>>
>> -- 
>> Gema Gomez-Solano<gema.gomez-solano at canonical.com 
>> <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa>>
>> Ubuntu QA Teamhttps://launchpad.net/~gema.gomez 
>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Egema.gomez>
>> Canonical Ltd.http://www.canonical.com
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>