QA wiki update

Nicholas Skaggs nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
Wed Jan 11 16:49:57 UTC 2012


Alex, I started working through your version of the wiki also today. I 
pulled some of the changes you had made and replaced/edited the relevant 
sections on the main page. It would be good to get your content merged 
asap, so it doesn't fall out of date. We have the ability to revert 
changes, so I would encourage you to make your changes directly onto the 
main site and we can tweak as we get more feedback. Thoughts?

Nicholas
> Hi Alex,
> thanks a lot for this change! My feedback follows.
>
> *Structure of the page*
>
> I think the wiki should have a clearer structure, so we should think
> about how to reorganize the text in a way that tells our story and
> sounds appealing to the reader. So I propose:
>
> == Welcome ==
> <introduction goes here, let's say what you have already before "What
> kinds of things does Ubuntu QA do?">
>
> == What we do ==
> <you have the list on the wiki, in my  opinion it needs a bit of reworking>
>
> == Getting involved ==
> <here we explain how to get involved in the work we are doing so things
> like a link to the qa-ubuntu list, qa launchpad group are good there,
> plus a link to our weekly meeting>
>
> == Currect Activities ==
> <Sounds good>
>
> == Contact Us ==
> <Sounds good too>
>
>
> *Content of the page*
>
> - I think this statement needs rewriting:
> "The Ubuntu QA team is focused on developing tools, policies, and
> practices for ensuring Ubuntu's quality as a distribution as well as
> providing general advice, oversight, and leadership of QA activities
> within the Ubuntu project."
>
> AFAIK, we do not develop tools, we mainly use them. But we write and
> develop test cases :D
>
> - The areas in which QA is divided do not make much sense either, at
> least from my perspective, maybe it was like that in the past? Need some
> time to think about this one.
>
> - What is the difference between the "Testing Team" and the "QA Team"?
> We seem to have two different pages and I am not sure they are trying to
> convey different messages. The paragraph starting with "We cannot leave
> quality to good luck" is repeated in both.
>
> I love the design and the icons at the top, very stylish :D
>
> Cheers,
> Gema
>
> On 13/12/11 21:00, Alex Lourie wrote:
> >/  Hi all
> />/
> />/  I've started working on our wiki [1] page update [2]. So far I've
> />/  cleared the obvious
> />/  parts (about Bug Squad for example), updated the content and changed the
> />/  order of things
> />/  to better cater to the potential reader.
> />/
> />/  Please review and provide feedback :-)
> />/
> />/  Thanks a lot.
> />/
> />/  [1]https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam
> />/  [2]https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlexLourie/QAWikiNew
> />/
> />/  -- 
> />/  Alex Lourie
> />/
> />/
> /
>
> -- 
> Gema Gomez-Solano<gema.gomez-solano at canonical.com  <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa>>
> Ubuntu QA Teamhttps://launchpad.net/~gema.gomez  <https://launchpad.net/%7Egema.gomez>
> Canonical Ltd.http://www.canonical.com
>
>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20120111/c43a0cc6/attachment.html>


More information about the Ubuntu-qa mailing list