Eucalyptus UEC-003 Test Results

josephtsalisbury at gmail.com josephtsalisbury at gmail.com
Wed Oct 14 19:06:02 UTC 2009


On Oct 14, 2009 7:50am, Joseph Salisbury <josephtsalisbury at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Thierry Carrez

> thierry.carrez at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> > josephtsalisbury at gmail.com wrote:

> >> I noticed one other thing that may or may not be an issue. I installed

> >> the x86 version of Karmic on these machines. I set the ARCH variable to

> >> i386 when bundling the images. However, when I run  
> euca-describe-images,

> >> I see the seventh column mention x86_64:

> >>

> >> $ euca-describe-images

> >> IMAGE emi-22F111AC i-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386.img.manifest.xml

> >> admin available public x86_64 machine

> >> IMAGE eki-403116B3

> >> k-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386-vmlinuz-virtual.manifest.xml admin

> >> available public x86_64 kernel

> >> IMAGE eri-23C9163C

> >> r-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386-initrd-virtual.manifest.xml admin

> >> available public x86_64 ramdisk

> >>

> >> Is this to be expected?

> >

> > In doubt, please file a bug about it. I'm not exactly sure what's

> > expected here, but it sure looks wrong to me.

> >

> > --

> > Thierry Carrez

> > Ubuntu server team

> >



> I'll file a bug and investigate further. Thanks for the information  
> Thierry.


Hi Thierry,

Your updated test case corrected the issue with images being registered as  
x86_64 when they should be i386:

$ euca-describe-images
IMAGE eki-414A16BA  
k-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386-vmlinuz-virtual.manifest.xml admin  
available public i386 kernel
IMAGE eri-24D11642  
r-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386-initrd-virtual.manifest.xml admin  
available public i386 ramdisk
IMAGE emi-23FE11BA i-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386.img.manifest.xml admin  
available public i386 machine

Thanks for updating the test case so quickly.

I'm having an issue starting an instance, which is the last command in step  
7. I still see the "disk not found" and "no domain with matching name  
found" errors, but I'm also seeing an error saying "no supported  
architecture for os type 'hvm'":

[Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] currently running/booting:  
i-39A80763
[Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAERROR ] libvirt: internal error no  
supported architecture for os type 'hvm' (code=1)
[Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAFATAL ] hypervisor failed to start  
domain
[Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAERROR ] libvirt: Domain not found:  
no domain with matching name 'i-39A80763' (code=42)
[Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] vrun(): [rm -rf  
/var/lib/eucalyptus/instances/admin/i-39A80763/]
[Wed Oct 14 14:57:01 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] stopping the network (vlan=10)

I'll investigate and test further.

Thanks,

Joe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20091014/37576d6f/attachment.html>


More information about the Ubuntu-qa mailing list