Eucalyptus UEC-003 Test Results

Joseph Salisbury josephtsalisbury at
Wed Oct 14 11:50:28 UTC 2009

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Thierry Carrez
<thierry.carrez at> wrote:
> josephtsalisbury at wrote:
>> I noticed one other thing that may or may not be an issue. I installed
>> the x86 version of Karmic on these machines. I set the ARCH variable to
>> i386 when bundling the images. However, when I run euca-describe-images,
>> I see the seventh column mention x86_64:
>> $ euca-describe-images
>> IMAGE emi-22F111AC i-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386.img.manifest.xml
>> admin available public x86_64 machine
>> IMAGE eki-403116B3
>> k-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386-vmlinuz-virtual.manifest.xml admin
>> available public x86_64 kernel
>> IMAGE eri-23C9163C
>> r-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386-initrd-virtual.manifest.xml admin
>> available public x86_64 ramdisk
>> Is this to be expected?
> In doubt, please file a bug about it. I'm not exactly sure what's
> expected here, but it sure looks wrong to me.
> --
> Thierry Carrez
> Ubuntu server team

I'll file a bug and investigate further.  Thanks for the information Thierry.

More information about the Ubuntu-qa mailing list