motu-release will revert libgems-ruby to the old state.
soren at ubuntu.com
Tue Sep 2 00:31:40 BST 2008
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 08:47:15PM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
>>> In this regard, I'd like to bring your attention however to ,
>>> without further comments. : <http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/revu1-
>> While this file is there because it's in the upstream tarball, it
>> isn't used. The diff.gz file adds the file
>> debian/libapache2-mod-passenger.postinst .
> Maybe you/the packager might want to strip debian out of the upstream
> tarball then?
As much as I dislike upstream tarballs shipping debian directories, I
really don't approve much of the practice of repacking tarballs just for
If I find something that claims to be the original tarball of passenger
2.0.3 (by having a filename such as passenger_2.0.3.orig.tar.gz), and
the checksum doesn't match what I can find on the upstream's ftp site, I
get *very* suspicious.
Soren Hansen |
Virtualisation specialist | Ubuntu Server Team
Canonical Ltd. | http://www.ubuntu.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20080902/d1d551f6/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the Ubuntu-motu