motu-release will revert libgems-ruby to the old state.

[Soren Hansen]

On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 08:47:15PM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
>>> In this regard, I'd like to bring your attention however to [1],
>>> without further comments.  [1]: <http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/revu1-
>>> incoming/passenger-0808222010/passenger-2.0.3/debian/postinst>
>> While this file is there because it's in the upstream tarball, it
>> isn't used. The diff.gz file adds the file
>> debian/libapache2-mod-passenger.postinst [2].
> Maybe you/the packager might want to strip debian out of the upstream
> tarball then?

As much as I dislike upstream tarballs shipping debian directories, I
really don't approve much of the practice of repacking tarballs just for
that reason.

If I find something that claims to be the original tarball of passenger
2.0.3 (by having a filename such as passenger_2.0.3.orig.tar.gz), and
the checksum doesn't match what I can find on the upstream's ftp site, I
get *very* suspicious.

-- 
Soren Hansen               | 
Virtualisation specialist  | Ubuntu Server Team
Canonical Ltd.             | http://www.ubuntu.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20080902/d1d551f6/attachment-0001.pgp