How to not collaborate with Debian (and upstream)

Michael Casadevall sonicmctails at gmail.com
Thu Aug 28 04:22:26 BST 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

+1 on reverting this upload until a consensus among -motu and -devel
can be reached.
Michael

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAki2GfEACgkQpblTBJ2i2puotQCeKAacMuKvT+X12/j70ePP53sG
CpoAn3HqlBssPzJOey4hs1o/GG9sNv+T
=YYNt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 August 2008 21:41, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>> That said, having had the details brought to our attention, I do share many
>> of your concerns about the contents of this upload.  I gather from other
>> comments Mathiaz made today on IRC that there was some pressure to get at
>> least a preliminary solution into the archive in time for FeatureFreeze due
>> to other packages depending on it, which may have played a role here; I
>> hope that we'll be seeing further uploads to resolve many of these issues
>> between now and Beta.
>
> Having spent roughly the last 75 minutes on IRC with Mathiaz, I am completely
> unconvinced that any course other than reverting this change is appropriate.
> Rather than take unilateral action, I'm asking for opinions on this.
>
> If we are going to put Gems in the system path, they ought to be well behaved
> first.
>
> Scott K
>
> --
> Ubuntu-motu mailing list
> Ubuntu-motu at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
>



More information about the Ubuntu-motu mailing list