Proposed Features for Launchpad Bugs 3.0 - call for help!

[Sarah Hobbs]

Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:23:06 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis 
> <kiko at async.com.br> wrote:
> On the other hand, the feedback I get,
>> despite me asking otherwise, doesn't really give me much to work on --
>> there is too much talking down our process, where what I am looking for
>> is more encouraging feedback.
> 
> I think what you are getting is honest feedback about frustration with 
> Launchpad.  I think that if people liked it better you'd get more 
> encouraging feedback if it was faster, the U/I was more stable, and distro 
> develpment work was better supported.
> 
> Scott K
> 
I'm in agreement with ScottK here - How, exactly, are you supposed to 
put a positive spin on things like bad performance, needing the tool 
that is critical to Ubuntu to actually work / be stable / not break 
other tools, etc?

That being said, well done for getting the incremental improvements 
done.  Good luck on fixing the rest!

Hobbsee

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20080825/70531ec1/attachment.pgp