[mr_faber@gmx.net: [Bug 5915] version 2.1.0 avaible]

[Jamie Jones]

On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 12:20 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> How do you think about updating avidemux?
> 
> I don't use it myself, but this user seems to insist that updating is a
> good idea, despite UVF. If users will use the newer version anyway, I
> don't see much point in insisting on the old version
> 
> Gruesse,
> 	Reinhard

Something to keep in mind, is that even if we do update to a new version
(already in marilat) it will depend on x264, which we don't have in
dapper (also in marilat - old version in revu).

The only issue I see is that x264 is done as a static lib. I tried
earlier to convert the one I sent to revu into shared libs, but my lack
of experience and lack of time has prevented me from doing that.

It may also be a good idea to update xvid from 1.1beta2 to 1.1 final
(again in marilat) to go with this, so we don't need to do it via
dapper-updates.

Otherwise it should be ok to update

Regards
Yagisan
-- 
Jamie Jones
Proprietor
E-Yagi Consulting
ABN: 32 138 593 410
Mob: +61 4 16 025 081
Email: eyagi.consulting at gmail.com
Web: http://www.eyagiconsulting.com

GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS Word attachments
PGP Key ID 0x4B6E7209
Fingerprint E1FD 9D7E 6BB4 1BD4 AEB9 3091 0027 CEFA 4B6E 7209
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20060213/60b3c8ad/attachment.pgp