[firstname.lastname@example.org: [Bug 5915] version 2.1.0 avaible]
hentai_yagi at yahoo.com.au
Mon Feb 13 12:16:06 GMT 2006
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 12:20 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> How do you think about updating avidemux?
> I don't use it myself, but this user seems to insist that updating is a
> good idea, despite UVF. If users will use the newer version anyway, I
> don't see much point in insisting on the old version
Something to keep in mind, is that even if we do update to a new version
(already in marilat) it will depend on x264, which we don't have in
dapper (also in marilat - old version in revu).
The only issue I see is that x264 is done as a static lib. I tried
earlier to convert the one I sent to revu into shared libs, but my lack
of experience and lack of time has prevented me from doing that.
It may also be a good idea to update xvid from 1.1beta2 to 1.1 final
(again in marilat) to go with this, so we don't need to do it via
Otherwise it should be ok to update
ABN: 32 138 593 410
Mob: +61 4 16 025 081
Email: eyagi.consulting at gmail.com
GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS Word attachments
PGP Key ID 0x4B6E7209
Fingerprint E1FD 9D7E 6BB4 1BD4 AEB9 3091 0027 CEFA 4B6E 7209
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20060213/60b3c8ad/attachment.pgp
More information about the Ubuntu-motu