Motion to suspend eir
IdleOne
oneidle at gmail.com
Tue Aug 23 11:48:26 UTC 2011
On 11-08-23 06:22 AM, Melissa Draper wrote:
> I agree with the previous posters, it's had a week to prove itself and
> sadly it is time to call this a lesson learned and proceed to making
> the most of it. I also fully agree that don't have the luxury of time
> in this case to wait for the next IRCC meeting. We are already
> struggling with bans made yesterday.
>
> We tested in production already, lets not make matters worse by
> hot-patching it.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Robert Wall <robert at rww.name
> <mailto:robert at rww.name>> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 01:01:12PM -0700, Neal Bussett wrote:
> > I motion we suspend the experiment with eir for the time being.
> I think
> > it would be prudent to do so immediately and not wait for
> discussion at
> > the next meeting.
>
> I agree. In its current form, it's more annoying than useful. I can't
> make the next meeting, but even if I could I think this is a
> non-controversial enough sentiment that it doesn't need discussion
> before removal. #ubuntu-ops-team has been constant complaining
> about it
> since its implementation.
>
> > I think it's become apparent over the past few days that eir doesn't
> > integrate well with our operator work flow and our current bot
> > ecosystem; we need to take a step back and figure out how better to
> > address our needs. At this time, eir is not a workable solution
> for us.
>
> It integrates fine with my workflow for my own bans, though I'm
> atypical. It doesn't fit well with our philosophy that ops should be
> able to edit each others bans, and it /really/ doesn't work well with
> the Floodbots.
>
> I do find eir useful for my own use, and would like it in
> #ubuntu*, but
> I think at this point it's obvious that we need to roll our own with
> customizations to allow ops to edit each others' (and the Floodbots')
> bans, and take a hard look at the configuration for default ban length
> and how long there is between expiration intervals.
>
> --
> Robert Wall
> robert at rww.name <mailto:robert at rww.name> | http://rww.name/
>
> --
> Ubuntu-irc mailing list
> Ubuntu-irc at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Ubuntu-irc at lists.ubuntu.com>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-irc
>
>
>
>
I have to agree with the rest of the team here even though I was all for
adding eir to #ubuntu at the last ircc meeting.
eir just doesn't work well "for us" at this time.
IdleOne.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-irc/attachments/20110823/775734f8/attachment.html>
More information about the Ubuntu-irc
mailing list