Proposal: Ubuntu Operator channel changes

[Juha Siltala]

On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 21:54 +0000, Matt Darcy wrote:

> On 07/11/10 21:51, Juha Siltala wrote:
> > The service channel would be much what the current #ubuntu-irc is like.
> > I disagree with Matt on the usefulness of the channel. It is useful, and
> > it's relative calm is not a reason to shut it down. International
> > support and issue resolution happens here, as well as help.



> I wasn't saying #ubuntu-irc was not useful, it's fine in it's current
> state, but we seem to revisit the purpose for #ubuntu-irc on a regular
> basis, trying to find a new use for it, if we need to keep trying to
> find a new use for it, then it maybe time to consider it a waste. I have
> no issue with it in it's current state.


Thanks for clarifying this. I have understood you wrong and I apologise.

-- 
Juha Siltala <topyli at ubuntu.com>
http://www.ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-irc/attachments/20101108/f4ed8560/attachment.html>