Call for comments on IRCC nominees

[Joseph Price]

correction: "and they've not provided a satisfactory"...

2009/12/16 Joseph Price <pricechild at gmail.com>:
> I'm bringing this up in response to popey.
>
> Nick was a really nice guy, I have no problem with him whatsoever. He just didn't do much. With him as past experience, I am unsure what more 'non-irc' people could do. I do not know what the CC expects them to do and they've provided a satisfactory explanation.
>
> I've also said it to many people in private, and I'll be the second to admit it here. I do not feel that I achieved *anything* during my two years. That's not to say I haven't tried though. (that's the difference between me and nick with our ircc position) And I don't think its my fault. I don't think the CC gave any support, and they are now simply wiping the slate clean to 'fix' things.
>
> Yeah, I'm annoyed, fed up, angry, upset, etc. etc. etc.
>
> Don't worry though, give it a few days, the CC will remove the 'draft' status of the governance document and I'll shut up!
>
> 2009/12/16 Richard JOHNSON <nixternal at ubuntu.com>:
>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:15:39PM +0000, Joseph Price wrote:
>> [...]
>>> What did boredandblogging do for the old IRCC? What benefits did he provide?
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what he's been telling you guys... but he brought
>>> *NOTHING* to the table.
>>>
>>> This did not benefit us one bit.
>>>
>>> What is your reasoning for this? What are we trying to fix? Lets not
>>> just say "its a good thing to do so and so", lets say "its a good
>>> thing because...."
>>
>> I am going to be honest and frank here. I am not responding to, nor care to
>> respond, to anything else you added to the previous mail I am responding
>> to. I dislike your attitude, it is starting to get on my last nerve. Why do
>> you have to bring up Nick? Nick isn't a part of these conversations and to
>> me it seems you are taking a cheap shot, a very cheap shot. In my eyes,
>> what has anyone brought to the IRCC that there was any benefits? If you
>> feel you brought so much, then why are we having all of these
>> conversations?
>>
>> That's it, I am pissed right now, so I am going to go breath. Lets keep
>> this stuff constructive, no more personal attacks or disrespect.
>>
>> --
>>  Name|  Richard JOHNSON
>> Title|  Developer
>>  WWW|  http://www.ubuntu.com
>> Email|  nixternal at ubuntu.com
>> GnuPG|  3578 0981 A21D D662 2A96  7623 F4C1 838C D8C4 4738
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJLKU2KAAoJEPTBg4zYxEc4/p4QAKwDMTiNEfLcIbbBHn0feVXd
>> KSXpy+pE2s8yHP0TytAs0x5o0beXgPI5ckgoAuJjx/5+K9gM+82tncpRwibM7NM6
>> wGJ/cIQC9lOyiVwLsS865avzYIAGiPkIVBVOm3cy1JxOg3+LfqWg1DzXi29w5/MQ
>> 3yIoALkDjEEW5pdYl6CbNMgrZs6cS49xDdLlNISF4SdLUkAp+UPmxOwK9IxqB08H
>> w/kPjaT54ixXkTGELrjuONtOEJzIYy0F+yFfGwQB9bt+reGBfSgkJGGpeIS28qD7
>> UMMNNXTbCc18lCBI4axvAuYFEjP39K44Jo3jQDDtxPJsbWv8+rlmZ5/vKeX5rZrp
>> H/SFdSS4EszFNnE/rAQ3Uei2ipklqZYRoJhSGCEFoU/TfBU1S63mTHqW5bzhzlHG
>> 8feL9ocg0+ueptF8srj79VGfmKbL0bnDP/b1CFNp0/dImD7FF6tWojqVHQNSk/xg
>> MzJ7N/vRHvyyR+uhelP7ywybXX79+a7OJjzf4gQ/Gov4xB8eXs/uHC3ZC21OUI5J
>> ydQC84BSklUozp44n9lCuOcUF/rpnTxfeXz3Z9JdWjeiJCwr16onZhGh05ApcJ1X
>> p/HRseNz6mvgrY0QTiwgtdCkcqKkSQ9U9YYsTB6aYYKl/PSgRnh9HyxMadpDxzNd
>> J11AIsUN0xO9i6gVztym
>> =NVeE
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>
>