One set of documentation needs to go

[Jonathan Aquilina]

No Tom I am not saying that. I am saying that any discrepencies need and
must be avoided. I dont know why the official documentation cannot be
updated what if a mistake is found for a released version?


On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Tom Davies <tomdavies04 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi :)
> I think that page is an exception rather than the rule.  The question
> about which is best is one for the forums and if they say the community one
> is out-of-date then we just update it.  If they say the official one is
> wrong then we are stuck because we can't update official docs at the
> moment.
>
> Pages should not be in conflict like that.  They should supplement each
> other.  Where they don't it's a problem.  Should we wipe out all
> documentation if we find a problem with 1 page in it?
> Regards from
> Tom :)
>
>
>   On Wednesday, 9 October 2013, 19:39, Jonathan Aquilina <
> eagles051387 at gmail.com> wrote:
>   The question becomes though which is the right one to follow the
> community one or official one. postfix and dovecot community documentation
> as an example.
>
> <snip />
>
>


-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20131009/ac266973/attachment.html>