One set of documentation needs to go

Jonathan Aquilina eagles051387 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 9 14:33:07 UTC 2013


The question becomes though which is the right one to follow the community
one or official one. postfix and dovecot community documentation as an
example.


On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Vikram Dhillon <dhillonv10 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
> <lyz at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Phill Whiteside <PhillW at ubuntu.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> It is precisely because several people new to docs knew or would
> understand
> >> that call, that I issued the call to join ranks and just 'get on with
> it'.
> >> I'd have no idea of how to help as I'm a wiki based person. Others would
> >> like to help but there is still confusing instructions. Do we choose and
> >> learn what ever docs uses or use what ever manual uses.... a.k.a.....
> get
> >> your acts together and agree on one system :)
> >>
> >> Agree a standard!!!!!!
>
> > It may seem frustrating to you, but different teams have very good
> > reasons for their different tools in their communities. Xubuntu is
> > using DocBook because it's a FOSS standard (Ubuntu docs used to be
> > written in it), Ubuntu uses Mallard because of their upstream of Gnome
> > and the Manual uses LaTeX to ease the on ramp for contributors and
> > ability to export it to the formats they need. In each of these
> > instances the tools used were selected specifically to suit the pool
> > of contributors they had.
> >
> > Hope this helps.
>
> Phill's reply took me by a surprise since he's an old member of our
> docs-family, but as Elizabeth stated, we had to use different tools
> due to different standards, however that really shouldn't matter too
> much. There aren't that many hoops to jump when working with
> documentation and if you feel like there are, that's why there is a
> community to help you with it. If you feel like some documentation is
> inadequate, open a launchpad bug with it, or just send a draft here
> with just plain text, we'll transform it for you in the correct format
> and all that so you don't have to worry it at all. Any good content is
> usable and extremely helpful to us.
>
> As a contributor, there are many ways we can work this out friends .
> If you feel like the manual project is splitting the efforts and so
> on, just submit the draft that you have to both mailing lists, and
> then let them worry about how to organize and pull the content
> together. Of course there are issues that we still need to iron out
> and I am sure in the upcoming months we will hopefully work towards a
> better solution.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Vikram Dhillon
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>



-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20131009/19fbfe7e/attachment.html>


More information about the ubuntu-doc mailing list